From: Fred Rourke [rourkefg@omantel.net.om] Sent: Wednesday, December 06, 2000 4:23 PM To: 928 Subject: [928] Re: CS Thrust bearing failure Dear Tony, Nice to hear from you. Perhaps I can enlighten you on what we think is going on. When a shaft is under torsion it naturally wants to shorten in length. The torque tube is given this name beause its principal function is to transmit torque from the engine to the gearbox and in the case of the automatic, via the torque converter. I would presume that in the case of the automatic transmission, the drive train requires a solid link simply because of the amount of torque being transmitted. Porsche probably felt this would be more reliable than a floating collar which would tend to wear. Consequently, the flex plate acts as its name suggests, as a flexible power coupling. Nothing unusual with that. Flexible couplings are normally used to take up any slight misalignment and hence stop any transverse loading from knocking out the main bearings of the crank. In the case of the 928 drive train the thing that is fundamentally different from most conventional cars is that the drive shaft is spinning at engine speed al the time. So far so good I trust. When Porsche designed the 928 they wanted perfect weight balance hence they stuck the gearbox in the rear. No big deal eh? Well not exactly. Up until the 928 was introduced the only marque I know of that had that configuration was the Alfa Sud although maybe there have been more. But I am pretty sure that no manufacturer ever attempted to put that amount of power and torque into that configuration, remember we are talking about a design that commenced in around 1975. When the 928 S4 was intoduced the torque derived was increased quite significantly. The torque tube, besides transmitting power, also acts as a transmission shock absorber and it does this by winding itself up to some extent. Hence as torque is applied the drive shaft will try to shorten itself and the flex plate does its stuff. Having established that logic, imagine now that for some reason the pinch bolt holding the flex plate hub onto the torque tube splines loses its grip slightly. You are doing 60 mph and you floor it. If your car is running properly, that kickdown will instantaneously throw your head back into the headrest such is the shock load impulse. Now if our perceived scenario is correct, this pulls out the hub ever so slightly. You then take your foot off the throttle but that does not lurch your head forward. Hence you can reasonably assume that there is not a comparable reaction in the other direction. Thus the spline takes up a new position in the hub until the next time it is yanked forward. Bit by bit the total displacement increases until it reaches a point where the thrust on the crank causes the main thrust bearing to give up the ghost and then you need a new engine and a healthy bank account. To this day Porsche have not issued issued a service bulletin telling their dealers to check the flex plate position on automatics but interestingly they very quickly proposed a solution to a problem that does not exist. Hmmmm! Unfortunately to date Porsche do not seem willing to agree with me that a problem exists on the automatic. It may well be possible to design a joint that slides but I presume the extreme load conditions in these cars ruled this out. I would like to see how GM have tackled this one on the new Corvettes now that they have slipped the gearbox to the rear of the car 25 years after Porsche thought of the idea. With regard to the vibration I have asked the listers several times if anyone else has experienced the vibration that I did but not much response. My car is very smooth up to this engine speed [3050 rpm] and very smooth above it. My instincts tell me that while my flex plate is positioned correctly the vibration is very much attenuated to the point where it is hardly noticeable. I think the S4 engine has a resonant frequency period at this speed hence the great lengths they went to in designing the engine mounts. I recently drove a 928 GTS that vibrated like a dog at this speed. Whether it is related to the mounts I do not know but mine were replaced just before I bought the car 3 years ago. Other listers report bad mounts cause a lot of vibration at tickover up to around 2800 rpm. Your guess is a good as mine. Hope you find that little lot of interest. Cheers Fred Rourke 1990 S4 auto- Oman